What is the DNP3.0 protocol?

• While IEC 60870–5 was still under devel­op­ment and was wait­ing to be stan­dard­ized, there was a need for an inter­op­er­a­ble com­mu­ni­ca­tions stan­dard to inter­con­nect var­i­ous mul­ti-ven­dor com­po­nents in the network. 
• Thus, in 1993, the par­tial­ly com­plet­ed IEC 60870–5 pro­to­col spec­i­fi­ca­tions were used as a base for an open and imme­di­ate­ly imple­mentable pro­to­col that specif­i­cal­ly catered to North Amer­i­can requirements.

• DNP3 is a lay­er 2 pro­to­col on the OSI model.

• The pro­to­col pro­vides data frag­men­ta­tion, error detec­tion, mul­ti­plex­ing, link con­trol, pri­or­i­ti­za­tion, and lay­er 2 address­ing ser­vices.

• For error detec­tion, it relies on cyclic redun­dan­cy check codes.

• Fur­ther, it defines a trans­port func­tion (ana­log to lay­er 4) and an appli­ca­tion lay­er (lay­er 7) that defines func­tions and gener­ic data types for com­mon SCADA appli­ca­tions. 

• Designed for harsh envi­ron­ments, DNP3 is more robust, effi­cient, and inter­op­er­a­ble than old­er pro­to­cols like Mod­bus, which is still some­times pre­ferred for its sim­plic­i­ty. 

Modbus vs DNP3

Mod­bus is an appli­ca­tion lay­er pro­to­col, where­as DNP3 con­sists of both an appli­ca­tion and data link lay­er. Anoth­er dif­fer­ence is that DNP3 also sup­ports unso­licit­ed mes­sag­ing. This means that RTUs can send updates when a change of sta­tus hap­pens, with­out wait­ing to be polled by the master.

Both pro­to­cols can be used over var­i­ous media, such as RS-232, RS-485, and TCP/IP.
While Mod­bus has a spe­cif­ic vari­ant for TCP/Ip com­munca­tions, DNP3 needs to be wrapped with­in TCP/IP.

Since you can send more data in small­er pack­ets and unlike Mod­bus, it is an event-dri­ven pro­to­col, mean­ing that net­work devices are able to trans­mit unso­licit­ed respons­es and con­ti­nu­ity is not required, using DNP3 can save lots of band­width. Fur­ther­more, DNP3 is high­ly stan­dard­ized and pro­vides high com­pat­i­bil­i­ty and inter­op­er­abil­i­ty between devices from many dif­fer­ent vendors.

Still, some pre­fer Mod­bus for its sim­plic­i­ty and the high num­ber of devices that sup­port the pro­to­col. So, both Mod­bus and DNP3 can be imple­ment­ed in func­tion­al and effi­cient SCADA sys­tems, mak­ing it strong­ly depen­dent on the project network.

IEC 104 vs DNP3

DNP3 and IEC-104 have both been specif­i­cal­ly devel­oped for SCADA com­mu­ni­ca­tion beyond the sub­sta­tion lev­el, for instance in order to con­trol a cir­cuit break­er from a Con­trol center.

How­ev­er, there are a few advan­tages of DNP3 that make it supe­ri­or in cer­tain applications.

• For the trans­mis­sion of larg­er data vol­umes over longer dis­tances, DNP3 is pre­ferred as it sends larg­er but few­er data pack­ages than IEC-104, which sends a high num­ber of small packages.
• DNP3 also enables faster data trans­mis­sion by oper­at­ing in high­er baud rates (num­ber of data bits trans­mit­ted in one sec­ond) than the IEC standards.
• At last, if the band­width is lim­it­ed, DNP3’s data pri­or­i­ty class­es (Class 1,2,3) allow the con­troller to poll in var­i­ous fre­quen­cies, as opposed to IEC-104, which only pro­vides a con­stant polling frequency.

Automation with IEC 61850 

The IEC 61850 stan­dard is enabling new opor­tu­ni­ties for ven­dor inter­op­er­abil­i­ty and advanced sub­sta­tion automa­tion. Find out how you can take advan­tage of IEC 61850 with easy-to-use and adapt­able solu­tions for a sim­ple migra­tion or retrofit.

HV Substation Automation

Pow­er­ful sub­sta­tion automa­tion sys­tems often han­dle numer­ous com­mu­ni­ca­tion pro­to­cols and media with­in one net­work, which can result in expen­sive and com­plex projects.  Avoid these prob­lems with inter­op­er­a­ble tech­nol­o­gy and smart con­fig­u­ra­tion tools.

MV Distribution Grid Automation

It is often dif­fi­cult to find the exact solu­tion you need in a MV appli­ca­tion, lead­ing to high­er costs than nec­es­sary. With our scal­able and adapt­able solu­tions you will be able to only pay for what you real­ly need, with­out com­prim­is­ing on qual­i­ty or security.

Photovoltaic Power Station

Using an open and scal­able SCADA sys­tem to mon­i­tor and con­trol a PV plant comes with many ben­e­fits on sev­er­al lev­els. Find out how advanced com­mu­ni­ca­tion tech­nol­o­gy affects PV oper­a­tion, main­te­nance, sys­tem design, invest­ment secu­ri­ty, profits…

Protocol Conversion

As com­mu­ni­ca­tion net­works grow in com­plex­i­ty, “plug and play” promis­es become hard­er to keep. Inter­op­er­a­ble pro­to­col con­vert­ers and soft­ware solu­tions with state-of-the-art capa­bil­i­ties and funci­tonal­i­ties can be the bridge to all the func­tions and flex­i­bil­i­ty your net­work needs.

Generation Dispatch Control Center

With a gen­er­a­tion dis­patch enter you can auto­mat­i­cal­ly con­trol the gen­er­a­tion of all pow­er plants and make direct bids for ancil­lary ser­vices on one plat­form. Check out the most effi­cient com­mu­ni­ca­tion path between gen­er­a­tion sites, grid oper­a­tors and the pow­er market.

Smart Metering

A sin­gle device that col­lects, process­es, trans­fers smart meter data and load curves from sev­er­al meters in dif­fer­ent pro­to­cols via ser­i­al or Eth­er­net, whilst pro­vid­ing advanced automa­tion func­tions? Adapt­able designs and a full com­mu­ni­ca­tion pro­to­col suite make it possible. 

Switchgear & Transformers

Some­times you have pre­ferred gear for a project or it has already been installed, but it is lack­ing the com­mu­ni­ca­tion capa­bil­i­ties to pro­vide the automa­tion func­tions you are look­ing for. With our soft­ware core iGComms any device can be as smart as you want it to be.